Closed betaFree during the closed beta and for 12 months after it.Join the beta →
Guide · 4 min read · updated

OnlyFans or Fansly? How to decide with your own numbers

Most comparisons of OnlyFans and Fansly list features and quote fees that change over time. This guide does something more useful: it gives you a way to decide from your own audience and your own numbers. The right answer depends on where your fans come from, how they like to pay, and how much time you have, not on which platform is said to be better.

Start with where your fans come from

A creator page earns from fans who arrive from somewhere. On most pages, the largest share of new subscribers comes from the creator’s own promotion on social media, in communities and through collaborations. That traffic follows you to whichever platform you link to.

The platforms differ in how much they help people discover you. Fansly puts more weight on discovery inside the platform, with feeds, tags and the option for fans to follow you for free before they pay. OnlyFans relies more on the audience you bring yourself. If you already have a steady flow of fans from outside, discovery matters less. If you are starting out, it may matter more.

Understand the two ways fans pay

Both platforms earn you money in similar ways: subscriptions, pay-per-view content, tips and paid messages. What differs is how you can arrange them. Fansly lets you offer more than one subscription tier, so a fan can start cheap and move up for more access. OnlyFans keeps one subscription price per page and leaves the rest to pay-per-view and bundles.

Neither model is better in general. Tiers suit creators who can sort their content into clear levels. A single price with strong pay-per-view suits creators whose income already comes mostly from messages and individual sales.

  • Look at the last 90 days: what share came from subscriptions, and what share from pay-per-view and tips?
  • If most of it is pay-per-view, the subscription model matters less than your messaging
  • If most of it is subscriptions, the way you can price access matters more

Check the terms yourself

Platform shares, payout schedules, payout methods and content rules change. Read the current creator terms and help pages of each platform before you decide, and note the date you checked. Do not rely on numbers quoted in articles, including old versions of your own notes.

Pay attention to the rules that affect your day-to-day work too: what you can post, how messages and automation are treated, and how disputes and refunds are handled.

Compare the numbers that matter

If you are already on one platform and considering the other, compare like with like. Gross revenue is a poor guide because the two audiences may be very different sizes. Compare per-fan numbers instead.

  • Net revenue per paying fan per month
  • Share of new subscribers who make a purchase in their first month
  • Renewal rate after the first month
  • Cost per subscriber for each promotion, by tracking link
  • Hours you spend each week on each platform

Test the second platform with a small step

You do not have to move. A small test tells you more than any comparison. Open a page on the second platform, post a smaller selection of content, and point one promotion channel at it with its own tracking link. Leave everything else unchanged.

Give the test enough time to cover at least one full subscription cycle, so you see who renews and not only who joins. Then compare per-fan revenue, renewals and your own time against the platform you already use.

Running both at once

Many creators end up on both. Done well, it spreads risk: a policy change or a quiet month on one platform does not take away all your income. Done badly, it doubles the work and splits attention, so fans on both feel neglected.

If you run both, decide what is the same everywhere and what differs. Keep your best content and your tone consistent, and use each platform’s strengths, for example tiers on Fansly, rather than copying every post word for word.

Do not decide on one good week

A big purchase from one fan can make a platform look better than it is. Look at a few months, and look at the median fan as well as the total. If one platform depends on a handful of big spenders, losing one of them changes the picture.

Write down what you expected before you started, and compare it with what happened. That record is more useful next time than any general advice.

Count your own time

Time is the cost most comparisons leave out. Each platform has its own inbox, its own upload flow and its own way of scheduling posts. Keep a rough log for two weeks of the hours you spend on each: posting, replying, preparing pay-per-view and promoting.

Then divide net revenue by hours. A platform that earns a little less but takes half the time may be the better use of your week, especially if you are running the page alone.

In short

  • Your fans mostly come from your own promotion, and they follow you to whichever platform you link.
  • Fansly leans more on discovery and tiers; OnlyFans more on your own audience and pay-per-view.
  • Read each platform’s current terms yourself and note the date.
  • Compare per-fan revenue and renewals, not totals, and test with one tracked promotion.

Keep going

See this for your own page.

erscope is in closed beta: free during the closed beta and for 12 months after it. Join the waitlist and we will let you in as soon as there is room.

Join the beta →